Vidarbha Banking Crisis Forces Farmers Into Debt Trap
- thenewsdirt
- 20m
- 7 min read

Farmers across India's agricultural heartland are facing an unprecedented credit crunch as cooperative banks, their primary source of institutional financing, grapple with mounting financial instabilities.
The situation has become particularly acute in Vidarbha, where districts like Buldhana and Akola are witnessing a dramatic reduction in credit availability. Recent data reveals that cooperative banks in Maharashtra are struggling with non-performing assets reaching alarming levels, with some institutions reporting gross NPA ratios exceeding 90 per cent.
This financial turmoil is forcing farmers to seek alternative sources of credit, often at exorbitant interest rates that can reach up to 50 per cent annually. The consequences extend far beyond mere financial inconvenience, affecting agricultural productivity and farmer confidence across the region.
Rural Credit System: How Cooperative Banks Support Vidarbha Farmers
Cooperative banks have historically served as the backbone of rural financing in India, operating under a three-tier structure that includes State Cooperative Banks at the apex, District Central Cooperative Banks at the district level, and Primary Agricultural Credit Societies at the village level.
These institutions, registered under the Cooperative Societies Act of 1912 and regulated by the Reserve Bank of India under the Banking Regulation Act of 1949, operate on principles of mutual aid whilst prioritising member welfare over profit maximisation.
The significance of cooperative banks in India's agricultural credit landscape cannot be overstated.
According to recent estimates, these institutions contribute approximately 30 per cent of the total agricultural credit disbursed across the country.
In 2015-16, cooperative banks disbursed ₹1.53 lakh crore out of the total ₹8.7 lakh crore in agricultural credit, whilst commercial banks dominated with a 60 per cent share, disbursing ₹6.04 lakh crore. Regional Rural Banks accounted for the remaining 10 per cent with ₹1.19 lakh crore in disbursements.
The competitive advantage of cooperative banks lies in their ability to offer agricultural loans at subsidised rates, typically ranging from 7-9 per cent per annum. This stands in stark contrast to private moneylenders, who charge between 20-50 per cent or higher, creating a substantial cost differential that makes cooperative banks indispensable for small and marginal farmers. The accessibility factor further enhances their appeal, as these institutions maintain a physical presence even in remote rural areas where commercial banks often find operations economically unviable.
In Vidarbha, the Buldana District Central Cooperative Bank, established in 1962, serves as a leading institution in Buldhana district, catering to rural and semi-urban areas with savings accounts, fixed deposits, and agricultural loans.
Similarly, the Akola District Central Cooperative Bank operates extensively to support farmers in Akola district, facilitating credit for crop production and allied activities. These institutions have traditionally been the lifeline for farmers in the region, where agriculture remains the primary economic activity.
Financial Crisis in Vidarbha's Cooperative Banks: NPAs and Capital Adequacy Issues
The financial health of cooperative banks in Vidarbha has deteriorated significantly over recent years, with several institutions reporting alarming levels of non-performing assets.
Historical data from 2017 revealed that the Wardha DCCB had reached a staggering 98 per cent Gross Non-Performing Assets ratio, whilst Buldhana and Nagpur DCCBs also faced substantial debt burdens. Collectively, 11 loss-making DCCBs in Maharashtra accumulated debts amounting to ₹550 crore.
Current financial indicators suggest that the situation has not improved substantially. As of December 31, 2024, Urban Cooperative Banks reported a Gross NPA ratio of 9.2 per cent, whilst District Central Cooperative Banks maintained a consolidated Gross NPA ratio of 9.6 per cent as of March 31, 2023.
In Maharashtra specifically, four out of 31 DCCBs had a Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets Ratio below the regulatory minimum of 9 per cent in 2023, indicating potential financial weakness that could affect their lending capacity.
The high NPA levels reflect multiple underlying issues, including poor loan recovery mechanisms, inadequate risk assessment procedures, and the inherent challenges of agricultural lending in a region prone to weather-related crop failures.
The agricultural sector in Vidarbha faces persistent challenges such as erratic rainfall patterns, low irrigation coverage, and recurring droughts that affect farmers' ability to repay loans on schedule.
These financial difficulties have created a vicious cycle where banks become increasingly reluctant to extend new credit, particularly to small and marginal farmers who are perceived as higher-risk borrowers.
The resulting credit squeeze has forced many farmers to seek alternative financing sources, often at significantly higher costs that further strain their already precarious financial positions.
Impact on Agricultural Credit Flow: How Banking Crisis Affects Vidarbha Farmer Access to Credit
The financial instability of cooperative banks has created a significant disruption in rural credit flow, particularly affecting small and marginal farmers who depend heavily on institutional credit for their agricultural activities.
High NPA ratios and low Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets Ratios have compelled banks to impose stricter loan conditions and limit credit availability as a risk management measure.
This reduction in institutional credit has forced farmers to increasingly rely on private moneylenders, who charge substantially higher interest rates.
Whilst cooperative banks offer agricultural loans at subsidised rates of around 7-9 per cent, private lenders often charge 20-50 per cent or more, creating a debt trap that can quickly spiral out of control.
In the region, where only 25.7 per cent of agricultural credit in Maharashtra was provided by rural branches in 2008, the reliance on cooperative banks is particularly pronounced, making any disruption in their operations especially damaging for small and marginal farmers.
The consequences of reduced credit flow extend beyond immediate financial constraints. Farmers may delay or forego essential investments in seeds, fertilisers, or irrigation infrastructure, leading to lower agricultural productivity.
A 2010 study highlighted that the urban-centric nature of agricultural credit in Maharashtra disadvantaged farmers in the region, who benefited the least from institutional credit growth. This trend has likely intensified due to the ongoing financial instability in cooperative banks.
The Reserve Bank of India has reported that the share of cooperative banks in agricultural credit has declined dramatically from 62 per cent in 1992-93 to 11.3 per cent in 2019-20, indicating a broader trend of reduced reliance on cooperatives.
This decline, potentially exacerbated by financial instability, has intensified the challenges faced by farmers who are already vulnerable due to environmental and economic factors.
Research has consistently shown that access to institutional credit significantly enhances crop productivity, with studies indicating that farmers with credit access achieve higher yields compared to those without.
The absence of reliable credit, therefore, leads to lower agricultural output, reduced income, and increased financial stress, creating a self-perpetuating cycle of economic distress.
Farmer Confidence Crisis: How Banking Instability Affects Agricultural Communities
The instability in cooperative banks has profoundly impacted Vidarbha farmers' confidence, particularly in regions where financial distress has historically been linked to farmer suicides.
When cooperative banks face financial difficulties, farmers lose trust in these institutions, fearing that their deposits are unsafe or that loans will not be available when needed.
This uncertainty leads to reduced investment in agricultural activities, as farmers hesitate to take risks or expand their operations.
The psychological impact of this instability extends far beyond financial concerns. The connection between credit access and farmer well-being is particularly stark. A comprehensive study on farmer suicides in the region identified debt as a primary cause, with private moneylenders being a significant source of high-interest loans due to banks' reluctance to lend to small farmers with poor repayment capacity. The study noted that banks often avoid lending to marginal farmers, pushing them toward private lenders, which exacerbates financial distress.
The deterioration of farmer confidence manifests in multiple ways. Farmers become increasingly hesitant to engage with banking institutions, preferring to limit their agricultural activities rather than risk falling into debt traps. This defensive approach leads to reduced agricultural productivity, as farmers avoid investments in improved seeds, fertilisers, or modern farming techniques that could enhance yields but require upfront capital.
The impact on agricultural productivity creates a broader economic ripple effect.
Lower productivity leads to reduced income for farmers, which in turn affects their ability to repay existing loans, further contributing to the NPA problem in cooperative banks. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle where financial instability in banks leads to reduced farmer confidence, which results in lower productivity and increased loan defaults, further weakening the banking system.
The social implications of this crisis cannot be understated. The fear of losing access to credit or falling into debt traps can erode farmer confidence to such an extent that it leads to reduced agricultural engagement and, in extreme cases, tragic outcomes.
The psychological burden of financial uncertainty, combined with the inherent risks of agricultural activities, creates a perfect storm that threatens the sustainability of farming communities across the region.
The crisis in cooperative banking highlights fundamental structural issues that require immediate attention. The current regulatory framework, whilst comprehensive, appears inadequate to address the unique challenges faced by cooperative banks operating in agriculturally dependent regions. The high NPA ratios and capital inadequacy issues suggest that existing supervision and monitoring mechanisms need strengthening.
The decline in cooperative banks' share of agricultural credit from 62 per cent in 1992-93 to 11.3 per cent in 2019-20 indicates a broader shift in the rural financing landscape. This trend, combined with the financial instability of existing cooperative banks, threatens to create a significant gap in rural credit provision, particularly for small and marginal farmers who are often unable to access commercial banking services.
The situation demands immediate intervention to restore confidence in cooperative banks and ensure continued credit flow to agricultural communities.
The stability of these institutions is not merely a financial issue but a matter of livelihood for millions of farmers across regions dependent on agriculture. Ensuring that cooperative banks remain robust and capable of providing uninterrupted credit is essential for maintaining agricultural productivity and the well-being of rural communities.
Without decisive action, the crisis in cooperative banking threatens to undermine the agricultural foundation upon which millions of farmers depend. The stakes are high, and the window for effective intervention is rapidly closing as farmer confidence continues to erode and credit access becomes increasingly constrained.
References
Buldana District Central Cooperative Bank. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://buldanadccbank.com/
Economic Review 2016, State Planning Board. (2016). Retrieved from https://spb.kerala.gov.in/economic-review/ER2016/chapter02_09.php
Indian Cooperative. (2023, April 3). Nabard: Key Statistics of Co-op Banks register rise in profit & advances. Retrieved from https://www.indiancooperative.com/from-states/nabard-presents-key-statistics-of-co-op-banks-notes-rise-in-profit-advances/
Indian Cooperative. (2025, April 2). Urban & Rural Co-op Banks report Profits, NPAs persist: MoS Finance. Retrieved from https://www.indiancooperative.com/banks/urban-rural-co-op-banks-report-profits-npas-persist-mos-finance/
Mint. (2017, May 22). Maharashtra: Plan to revive ailing cooperative banks in state hits hurdle. Retrieved from https://www.livemint.com/Industry/Gf8567Jwcr5wiS5nmfAErK/Maharashtra-Plan-to-revive-ailing-cooperative-banks-in-stat.html
NABARD. (2024). Annual Report 2023-24. Retrieved from https://www.nabard.org/annual-report/index.html
ResearchGate. (2015). Impact of agricultural credit on agriculture production: an empirical analysis in India. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282249869_Impact_of_agricultural_credit_on_agriculture_production_an_empirical_analysis_in_India
Testbook. (2025, March 20). In India, which of the following have the highest share in the disbursement of credit to agriculture and allied activities? Retrieved from https://testbook.com/question-answer/in-india-which-of-the-following-have-the-highest--60214b01bb556431ae804801
The Hindu. (2010, August 12). How ‘rural’ is India’s agricultural credit? Retrieved from https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/How-lsquorural-is-Indias-agricultural-credit/article16129297.ece
PMC. (n.d.). Farmers’ suicides in the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra, India: a qualitative exploration of their causes. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3291283/