top of page
Search

Why Nagpur Oranges Cannot Be Organic

Why Nagpur Oranges Cannot Be Organic
Why Nagpur Oranges Cannot Be Organic

Nagpur, the main city of Maharashtra’s Vidarbha region, proudly wears the title “Orange City” for its famed sweet oranges.


These mandarins, popularly known as Nagpur oranges, have a unique tangy-sweet flavour and even boast a Geographical Indication tag linking them to this region’s black soil and dry climate.


Yet behind the bright peels and worldwide acclaim lies a less palatable reality: most of these oranges are cultivated with chemical fertilisers and pesticides rather than natural methods. In orchards across Vidarbha, chemical inputs have become almost indispensable to protect the crop from persistent pests and diseases.


As a result, truly organic Nagpur oranges are exceedingly rare, raising a pressing question about why this iconic fruit cannot be grown organically in its own homeland.


Chemical Dependency in the Orange Belt


Nagpur’s orange cultivation expanded dramatically in the late 20th century, bringing with it a heavy reliance on chemical inputs.


By the 1970s, a veritable “orange rush” saw orchards replace traditional crops across several Vidarbha districts.

Farmers eager for higher profits began adopting intensive practices: chemical fertilisers took over from organic manure as early as the 1960s, and trees were planted closer together to maximise yield. Horticulturists even switched to faster-maturing rootstock varieties to speed up fruiting, a move that halved the typical tree’s lifespan from around 65 years to barely 30 years. These changes boosted production in the short term but at a cost. Monoculture orange orchards stretched over large areas, and water was pumped relentlessly to sustain them.


In prime growing belts like Warud in Amravati district, an average of 19 borewells sprang up per square kilometre as farmers chased groundwater.


By the 1980s, water tables had plummeted from just 3 metres below ground to over 120 metres deep in some orcharding hubs.


This unsustainable extraction, combined with the removal of native trees for orchard expansion, underscored the extent to which the orange boom rode on environmental exploitation.


Pests, Diseases and the Chemical Cycle


Intensive orange farming in Vidarbha also made the crop highly vulnerable to pest infestations and disease outbreaks.


Starting in the 1980s, orchards began suffering major setbacks. A whitefly epidemic spread through the groves and caused widespread tree deaths.

By the early 2000s, a chronic fungal blight (Phytophthora) had also permeated the soil, causing gummosis and die-back disease in virtually every orchard. In the decade that followed, erratic weather, including droughts and heat waves, further weakened the orange trees, halving the region’s productive orchard area by the early 2000s.


One extreme summer in 2010 saw temperatures soar above 46°C for weeks, wiping out roughly a quarter of all orange trees in central Maharashtra. New threats kept emerging as well. Around 2011, farmers grappled with the arrival of the citrus psylla insect, which transmits the deadly citrus greening disease. This disease (also known as Huanglongbing) has no cure. Infected trees must be uprooted, and this has devastated entire stretches of orchards.


By 2018, reports indicated that tens of thousands of hectares of Nagpur mandarin trees were affected by greening, slashing yields by up to 40% in some areas. Faced with these relentless adversities, growers became increasingly dependent on chemical solutions simply to keep their orchards viable.

The heavy use of agrochemicals, however, has itself fed into a vicious cycle. Decades of monocropping and liberal pesticide spraying have upset the ecosystem balance in the orange belt. Agricultural experts note that excessive chemical fertiliser and water misuse led to weaker trees and recurring pest flare-ups. When pests strike, farmers often respond by spraying more potent pesticides, sometimes even using unapproved cocktails pushed by agrochemical dealers.


For example, in recent years, nearly 90% of orange growers reportedly resorted to a powerful insecticide called profenofos-cypermethrin to kill psylla, despite it not being recommended on citrus.


Such broad-spectrum chemicals may give temporary relief but also wipe out beneficial insects like pollinating bees, and pests soon evolve resistance. In the aftermath of one pest’s decline, others rebound in greater numbers, forcing farmers into further rounds of spraying.


This pesticide treadmill not only drains farmers financially, often to the brink of bankruptcy, but also poisons the surrounding environment.

As one seasoned orange grower put it, these practices “destroy the environment” of the orchards to the point where even honey bees have vanished from some groves.


In essence, the conventional Nagpur orange orchard is locked in a high-input, chemical-dependent cycle, one that leaves little room for organic methods to succeed.


Organic Farming Remains Elusive


In spite of the odds, a small number of Vidarbha growers have experimented with organic orange cultivation, and some have achieved remarkable results on their individual farms.


They replaced synthetic agrochemicals with traditional practices like heavy mulching, composting, and the use of bio-fertilisers such as jeevamrut (a fermented mixture of cattle dung, urine and herbal extracts).

In one notable case, an orchardist who was on the verge of losing his entire orange grove to a fungal blight stopped using chemicals as a last resort. He treated the diseased trees with organic brews and covered the soil with mulch, and within a year, the grove made a stunning recovery.


His trees, once nearly dead, began producing about 2,000 fruits each season and showed no traces of the deadly Phytophthora fungus, even though neighbouring orchards remained infected. Success stories like this demonstrate the potential of organic methods to rejuvenate citrus health while cutting input costs. Some long-time organic farmers argue that the yield under organic management eventually matches or even exceeds conventional orchards, as healthier trees live longer and bear fruit for more years.


Scaling up these organic triumphs to the wider Nagpur orange industry, however, has proven extremely difficult. For the vast majority of orange cultivators, going organic would mean accepting lower output, at least initially, and navigating a host of practical challenges.


Agricultural officials have repeatedly stated that organic orange farming is not feasible on a large scale because it is “tedious”, slow to show results, and would likely reduce production. Indeed, an organically grown mandarin sapling takes about 7 to 8 years to yield its first full crop, compared to roughly 5 years under intensive chemical feeding.


This delay, combined with typically smaller harvests in the conversion period, can spell financial ruin for small farmers unless they have support.


But support is precisely what is lacking. Organic certification is expensive and cumbersome, adding cost without immediate benefit. Unlike cash subsidies for fertilisers or pesticides, there are minimal incentives for farmers to adopt bio-inputs or maintain fallow periods for soil regeneration.


Crucially, finding enough organic manure and mulch material is another major hurdle; most local farmers do not raise livestock at a scale to supply their orchards with adequate compost.


Some orange growers who attempted organic methods have given up after facing manure shortages and declining yields, reverting to chemical sprays out of sheer necessity. In their view, without external help to bridge the transition, sticking with “hazardous” chemical farming seems like the only viable option.


There is also a clear disconnect between grassroots innovators and the prevailing institutional mindset. Pioneering farmers maintain that problems like pest infestations can be managed naturally, for instance, by improving soil health and biodiversity, but such approaches require patience and knowledge-sharing.


Research bodies, on the other hand, have been slow to validate or promote organic techniques for citrus.


Scientists at the regional citrus research centre found little difference in yield during short-term organic trials on their experimental plots, and thus continue to recommend chemical treatments as the standard remedy for diseases. Field farmers counter that these trials were too simplistic, failing to replicate real farm conditions and the full suite of organic practices needed to see benefits.


This lack of institutional encouragement leaves individual organic practitioners isolated. While a farmers’ movement for “zero-budget natural farming” has gained some traction in the region, it remains far from the mainstream. In essence, Nagpur’s iconic orange remains overwhelmingly a chemically grown crop, not because growers are unaware of the downsides, but because the transition to organic farming poses steep agronomic and economic barriers that few can afford to overcome under the current system.


The story of Nagpur’s orange belt is, ultimately, one of modern agriculture’s grand ironies. A fruit that put Vidarbha on the map has also pushed its soil and growers to the brink through intensive practices.


Many farmers, squeezed by recurring losses and environmental decline, are already pruning their ambitions.


Some have even started replacing orange groves with hardier, low-input crops in a bid to survive.


Their experiences underscore that the Nagpur orange’s future depends on recalibrating its relationship with nature.


For now, chemical fertilisers and pesticides remain the unsustainable backbone of this iconic industry, propping it up at great ecological cost.

True organic Nagpur oranges remain a rarity, highlighting the formidable gap between the ideal of sustainable farming and the reality on the ground in India’s Orange City. Bridging that gap would require nothing short of a paradigm shift. For the time being, any such transformation remains only a distant prospect on the horizon.



References




About the Author

The NewsDirt is a trusted source for authentic, ground-level journalism, highlighting the daily struggles, public issues, history, and local stories from Vidarbha’s cities, towns, and villages. Committed to amplifying voices often ignored by mainstream media, we bring you reliable, factual, and impactful reporting from Vidarbha’s grassroots.

bottom of page